by Julie Bruno, MSW, AAHPM Director of Education
In anticipation of the Hospice Medical Director Course in September, eNews has included some cases related to the content of the course. The last case stimulated some difference of opinion.
Mary Jane was on service with the diagnosis of adult failure to thrive. She fell and was hospitalized with a fractured trochanter. Her pain was poorly controlled but she was scheduled to be discharged to home. Unfortunately, her family was unavailable to receive her till later in the week. You recommend…
1. Respite Care
2. GIP at a local skilled nursing facility
3. Provide continuous care
4. None-of-the-above: it’s the patient/family’s responsibility
While the information we have about “Mary Jane” is limited, the answer listed in eNews was Respite Care. One member says, “I’d admit Mary Jane to GIP as her pain is poorly controlled. I recognize that her hospice diagnosis is adult failure to thrive, but pain could be a contributing factor to her global deterioration. She is too symptomatic for respite.”
Another asked, “Why wouldn’t GIP make more sense, at least for now, when the patient’s pain is reported to be “poorly controlled?”
The rationale for GIP?
The diagnosis of FTT is so broad and vague that many hospices would look at pain as part of the syndrome. Granted – the pain came from the hip fracture BUT now the patient isn’t thriving because of pain. And the hip fracture came from the debility and osteoporosis which contributed to the FTT. It is very messy. So many folks have suggested GIP because there are symptom management issues that must be addressed and cannot be safely and effectively done so in “respite”.
Another option would be skilled care rehabilitation with hospice to follow concurrently given differing diagnoses. This is fraught with problems because most nursing facilities are averse to doing this.”
What do you think?